Why lens f-stops and front filter diameters matter for good signal

Sigma 28mm art lens front view

Sigma 28mm prime art lens showing the 77mm front lens element and filter area.

Light allows a photograph to be captured.

The three components that, when combined, affect the quality of light are collectively called “signal.”

The recipe for a strong signal is:

  • an f-stop of 2.0 or better, like f1.8 or even f1.4;

  • a front lens element filter size that is as large as possible like 77mm; and,

  • time (i.e. shutter speed).

Two of these three components are dependent upon lens choice: f-stop and the front glass element/filter size.

Meet my favorite Milky Way Dark Horse Nebula lens: a 28mm, f-1.4 Sigma art prime for Nikon F with a 77mm front lens element/filter.

Once I understood that signal is directly proportional to image quality, I invested in glass that met the criteria and my life was transformed for the better when it comes to low-light photography especially with regard to the Milk Way!

In addition, f-stops of 2.0 or better (i.e. f1.8 or f1.4) make it so much easier to SEE a bright star in a camera’s magnified LCD screen so I can achieve sharp focus without having to take a series of test images making minute lens focus adjustments between each one. To compare, my collection of lenses with f-stops of 2.8, 4 and smaller make it difficult or impossible for me to see to focus using the LCD screen because not enough light — i.e. signal — is being passed through from the lens to the camera.

It has taken me over 45 years, but now I finally get why lenses with larger apertures and larger front lens elements command a premium price, especially if they are primes and not zooms.

For my low-light exposure workflow especially when my objective is the Milky Way, I choose:

  • an f-stop of 1.8 or 1.4;

  • a lens with a large front element, like 77mm;

  • a camera shutter speed that is appropriate to the light source in my composition — more time means more light.

What I don’t want more of is ISO, which is the camera’s sensitivity to light. Why? Because a higher ISO means images will also be higher in pixelization or grain — normally, an unwanted result. For me, when photographing in low light, I strive to keep my ISO as low as possible given the other three components of signal that I can adjust in the field to achieve my creative vision.

I invite you to learn more about signal by tuning into episode #39 “The Power of Signal", which is part of the free audio (i.e. radio) show entitled, “After Dark Photography Podcast” — a series produced and narrated by Kristine Rose Richer of Kristine Rose Photography out of Nova Scotia, Canada.

Previous
Previous

Why stand-up video selfies matter for still photographers